There was light rain today, with a 1500 foot ceiling, so we didn't go up. Instead, Adam grilled me on the forces of flight, the varieties of stability, and their effects upon an airplane. It was essentially a review of the text and groundschool, but I found it useful both to know that I had most of the stuff cold and because of the educational experience. (More about that later.) After he was satisfied that I really did understand that stuff aod some other things, he checked off several pages of items in the Jeppeson Syllabus, which this school uses to log the progress of each student. (Or he does, anyway.)
Then we started in on a discussion of airspaces. This is pretty complicated, so I'll try to summarize it here and find out what I don't know.
The FAA divides the sky into six classes of airspace, viz.,
(Fixed some bad errors on 97.12.13, but still trying to get this
damn stuff straight...)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
flight level 18
and Above |
NO VFR in Class A Airspace
(18,000 ft + AGL) |
N/A | ||
|
Busy
airports |
Blue
circle |
|
|
|
|
Congested
airports |
magenta circle |
|
|
|
|
Airspace surrounding an airport with an operating
control tower not associated with class B or class C
Normal airspace--
|
Dashed
blue circle |
|
||
|
Remaining controlled airspace | dashed
magenta line |
ATC commo with IFR traffic,
enroute to airport
|
Less than 10,000 ft. MSL
|
|
|
|
Surface to 1,200 ft. (regardless of MSL altitude)
Day
|
|||
Why is there no Class F Airspace?
Being grilled turned out to be interesting in itself because it had
been many MANY years since I was last in the position of having to supply
not only the concept but the exact terminology as well. Picking out
such an answer on a multiple choice test usually isn't very hard if you
know anything at all about the subject, but saying the right answer
is something else again.
How is this related to the kinds of courses I ususally teach? Right
now, I don't really know. Writing courses have essentially no content of
their own, so this kind of question and answer routine seems pretty much
irrelevant. (You could grill a student on punctuation rules, say,
but they have almost nothing to do with writing in the sense of composition
or creative writing. In a lit course the question and answer routine
seems to make a little more sense, and in fact I used to ask my
lit students questions that had specific answers--until I realized that
questions with specific answers aren't very interesting, don't require
my intervention or monitoring, and are essentially irrelevant to a student's
learning or understanding of a work of literature. (The answers are
useful only as tools, not as ends in themselves.)